Instaloader is a Python 3 application with a single dependency (Pythonβs requests). This makes it a relatively simple package, however not as straightforward as only packaging up a shell script would be. Because of the learning opportunities and simplicity, this makes it a good introduction package.
Instaloader Code Overview
The first thing we do is look at the applicationβs GitHub page. A few things stand out which we take a note of:
What we notice here is some information that will come in handy later:
The tool contains a setup.py script
It has a release
The license is MIT based
Weβll be digging into each of these more later, for now it is just information to know.
Setting Up The Environment
We will assume that we have already followed our documentation on setting up a packing environment.
Letβs set up our directories now for this package:
Everything that relates to us building a package will be using ~/kali/. In there will be two sub folders:
packages/ will be a source code of the package we are going to create
upstream/ will be a compressed file of the source code of the application (ideally from a tag version release which we saw before)
Downloading Tag Releases
Because we are making a new package from scratch, weβll manually download the version of the tool we want to package up. If we were updating a package (and it was packaged correctly), there is a process to help speed it up. However, this will be covered in another guide.
Going to the GitHubβs release page, we can see the latest version (which at the time of writing is 4.4.4). Here is the option to download instaloader-v4.4.4-windows-standalone.zip, as well as Source Code (zip), and Source Code (tar.gz). We are interested in the tar.gz option.
We will use wget and make sure to format its name appropriately according to Debianβs standards for source packages (take note of .orig.tar.gz):
If there isnβt a tag release for the software (or it hasnβt had an release in some time), we can use the latest git commit. This is covered in another guide. However, it is preferred to use a tag release when available.
Creating Package Source Code
We need to switch paths to the working location of the package:
:~$ cd ~/kali/packages/instaloader/
:~/kali/packages/instaloader$
We are now going to create a new blank git repository:
:~/kali/packages/instaloader$ git init
Initialized empty Git repository in /home/kali/kali/packages/instaloader/.git/
:~/kali/packages/instaloader$
If we wanted to, we can confirm this by looking at βstatusβ and βlogβ:
:~/kali/packages/instaloader$ git status
On branch master
No commits yet
nothing to commit (create/copy files and use "git add" to track)
:~/kali/packages/instaloader$
:~/kali/packages/instaloader$ git log
fatal: your current branch 'master' does not have any commits yet
:~/kali/packages/instaloader$
Great. Everything is empty; we have a clean working area.
We can now import the upstream version into our packing source code by using the file downloaded from wget before. Because of the filename format, gbp is able to detect the values instaloader as the package name, and 4.4.4 as the version. We just press enter to accept the default values:
:~/kali/packages/instaloader$ gbp import-orig ~/kali/upstream/instaloader_4.4.4.orig.tar.gz
What will be the source package name? [instaloader]
What is the upstream version? [4.4.4]
gbp:info: Importing '/home/kali/kali/upstream/instaloader_4.4.4.orig.tar.gz' to branch 'upstream'...
gbp:info: Source package is instaloader
gbp:info: Upstream version is 4.4.4
gbp:info: Successfully imported version 4.4.4 of /home/kali/kali/upstream/instaloader_4.4.4.orig.tar.gz
:~/kali/packages/instaloader$
If we wanted to check everything is okay, once again, we can use git to do so:
:~/kali/packages/instaloader$ git status
On branch master
nothing to commit, working tree clean
:~/kali/packages/instaloader$
:~/kali/packages/instaloader$ git log
commit 494f71875f10f8d1da69a8edf2fc75300e4485b9 (HEAD -> master, tag: upstream/4.4.4, upstream)
Author: Joseph O'Gorman <>
New upstream version 4.4.4
:~/kali/packages/instaloader$
:~/kali/packages/instaloader$ git branch -v
* master 494f718 New upstream version 4.4.4
pristine-tar 439fe30 pristine-tar data for instaloader_4.4.4.orig.tar.gz
upstream 494f718 New upstream version 4.4.4
:~/kali/packages/instaloader$
So there is now an automatic commit created in the master branch (which is the current active branch, shown by the *), as well as two other branches:
pristine-tar which is metadata from the import
upstream which is the source code of the application, without any of our package modifications
We are creating a Kali package, and we donβt use the master branch, but rather kali/master. So letβs switch:
:~/kali/packages/instaloader$ git checkout -b kali/master
Switched to a new branch 'kali/master'
:~/kali/packages/instaloader$
:~/kali/packages/instaloader$ git branch -D master
Deleted branch master (was 494f718).
:~/kali/packages/instaloader$
:~/kali/packages/instaloader$ git branch -v
* kali/master 494f718 New upstream version 4.4.4
pristine-tar 439fe30 pristine-tar data for instaloader_4.4.4.orig.tar.gz
upstream 494f718 New upstream version 4.4.4
:~/kali/packages/instaloader$
Now we can generate the necessary files required to build a Debain-based package and also remove any example files created. During the process, we will be asked if its:
Single binary
Arch-Independent
Library
Python
We are going to keep it simple, and go with βSingleβ. Then accept whatβs on the screen with Y. If you would like more information about when to use what option, please see the manpage for dh_make.:
:~/kali/packages/instaloader$ dh_make --file ~/kali/upstream/instaloader_4.4.4.orig.tar.gz -p instaloader_4.4.4
Type of package: (single, indep, library, python)
[s/i/l/p]?
Maintainer Name : Joseph O'Gorman
Email-Address :
Date : Thu, 02 Jul 2020 17:59:47 -0400
Package Name : instaloader
Version : 4.4.4
License : blank
Package Type : single
Are the details correct? [Y/n/q]
Currently there is not top level Makefile. This may require additional tuning
Done. Please edit the files in the debian/ subdirectory now.
:~/kali/packages/instaloader$
:~/kali/packages/instaloader$ rm debian/*.docs debian/README* debian/*.ex debian/*.EX
:~/kali/packages/instaloader$
:~/kali/packages/instaloader$ rm -r debian/upstream
:~/kali/packages/instaloader$
We use --file to say where the orig.tar.gz file is. If the file was one directory back (../), this would not be needed, however as we have created a separate location for the file it is.
If you would like to see what got generated when using dh_make, we can use git:
:~/kali/packages/instaloader$ git status
On branch kali/master
Untracked files:
(use "git add <file>..." to include in what will be committed)
debian/
nothing added to commit but untracked files present (use "git add" to track)
:~/kali/packages/instaloader$
:~/kali/packages/instaloader$ ls -R debian/
debian/:
changelog control copyright rules source
debian/source:
format
:~/kali/packages/instaloader$
A quick overview of each of those files:
changelog - tracks when the package gets an update (including why and by who). This is responsible for the package version
control - is the metadata for the package (often seen with apt)
copyright - what is under what license. The package can be under something different to the work we have put in to create the package
rules - how to install the package
source/format - is the source package format
At this point, we have the base packaging files in place, and it feels like a good idea to commit before starting some real work:
We now need to edit most of these to make sure the information is accurate. We can use what we found on GitHub to supply the correct info into the debian/ files:
License
Dependencies
Maintainers
Description
Collecting InformationLicense/Maintainers
For this package, its straight forward. GitHub has given us a helping hand, and detected the license as MIT. We can also see there is a license file:
As it turns out, there is: AUTHORS.md, docs/, instaloader.py, and README.rst, so we have a few places to look at. Starting with AUTHORS.md, we can see the authors name and their method of contact:
So rather than an email address, it appears to be a username (could be just for GitHub, or a generic Internet handle). This is enough for us to go forward (even though its not ideal).
Another trick we could try is looking to see if they used a βlegitβ email address with git:
We need to see what is required to be installed on the machine in order for the application to work. Either pre-installed or will be installed using the application.
Some starting places to look at for this information:
README*
SETUP*
INSTALL*
docs/
There is a README for this application, but it just says how to install the application, rather than how to build it/compile from source:
We managed to get the following information from this:
From the shebang, we can see its Python 3 (#!/usr/bin/env python3).
We can see it wants Python 3.5 or higher
We can see it wants requests and for it to be v2.4 or higher
We can see if its on Windows, it requires another dependency, but we are Linux, so not the case
We can see the programβs home URL
We can see the license (MIT)
We can see the authors and their email addresses
We can get a description of the program
Handy!
When packing, we are building a standalone package, which needs to be able to install offline. Something else which needs to be kept in mind, other systems package management systems, such as Pythonβs pip, or rubyβs gems. Any of these dependencies also need to be in the main OS package management. In our case, we need Pythonβs requests.
We have two ways of searching for it. We can use either:
So we need to do better to shorten the list, by just searching the short version of the description (we will cover this more later, but its the visible part of the output):
:~/kali/packages/instaloader$ apt-cache search --names-only requests | wc -l
19
:~/kali/packages/instaloader$
:~/kali/packages/instaloader$ apt-cache search --names-only python-requests
python-requests-cache-doc - persistent cache for requests library (doc)
python-requests-doc - elegant and simple HTTP library for Python (Documentation)
python-requests-mock-doc - mock out responses from the requests package - doc
python-requests-oauthlib-doc - module providing OAuthlib auth support for requests (Common Documentation)
python-requests-toolbelt-doc - Utility belt for python3-requests (documentation)
:~/kali/packages/instaloader$
:~/kali/packages/instaloader$ apt-cache search --names-only python-requests | grep -vi 'doc'
:~/kali/packages/instaloader$
After removing the documentation from the results, we donβt get any results. So on with the next search!:
:~/kali/packages/instaloader$ apt-cache search --names-only python3-requests
python3-requests - elegant and simple HTTP library for Python3, built for human beings
python3-requests-cache - persistent cache for requests library (Python 3)
python3-requests-file - File transport adapter for Requests - Python 3.X
python3-requests-futures - library for asynchronous HTTP requests (Python 3)
python3-requests-kerberos - Kerberos/GSSAPI authentication handler for python-requests - Python 3.x
python3-requests-mock - mock out responses from the requests package - Python 3.x
python3-requests-ntlm - Adds support for NTLM authentication to the requests library
python3-requests-oauthlib - module providing OAuthlib auth support for requests (Python 3)
python3-requests-toolbelt - Utility belt for advanced users of python3-requests
python3-requests-unixsocket - Use requests to talk HTTP via a UNIX domain socket - Python 3.x
python3-requestsexceptions - import exceptions from bundled packages in requests. - Python 3.x
:~/kali/packages/instaloader$
The first result, python3-requests, looks exactly right! We can look closer:
And we can see its version is 2.23.0, which is higher than than 2.4, so we donβt need to update the package. This will be covered in another guide when required.
Maintainers
While doing the other parts, we have discovered the authors and maintainers of the software, so we donβt need to do anything extra for this.
Description
There are two descriptions that we need to supply, a long description and a short description. When we look at the GitHub page we can see an about section that we can use for the short description. For the long description, we can use the description in the README.
We also have a value from the setup.py.
Editing Package Source Code
Now that we have that information copied down, we can start to populate the files in the debian/ folder we created with dh_make.
If we followed the documentation on setting up a packaging environment, the only values we will need to alter would be distribution (from UNRELEASED to kali-dev), version (from 4.4.4-1 to 4.4.4-0kali1) and the log entry:
:~/kali/packages/instaloader$ cat debian/changelog
instaloader (4.4.4-1) UNRELEASED; urgency=medium
* Initial release (Closes: #nnnn) <nnnn is the bug number of your ITP>
-- Joseph O'Gorman <> Thu, 02 Jul 2020 17:59:47 -0400
:~/kali/packages/instaloader$
:~/kali/packages/instaloader$ vim debian/changelog
:~/kali/packages/instaloader$
:~/kali/packages/instaloader$ cat debian/changelog
instaloader (4.4.4-0kali1) kali-dev; urgency=medium
* Initial release
-- Joseph O'Gorman <> Thu, 02 Jul 2020 17:59:47 -0400
:~/kali/packages/instaloader$
Control
This file is the metadata for the package, and contains a lot of information.
:~/kali/packages/instaloader$ cat debian/control
Source: instaloader
Section: unknown
Priority: optional
Maintainer: Joseph O'Gorman <>
Rules-Requires-Root: no
Build-Depends:
debhelper-compat (= 13)
Standards-Version: 4.6.1
Homepage: <insert the upstream URL, if relevant>
#Vcs-Browser: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/instaloader
#Vcs-Git: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/instaloader.git
Package: instaloader
Architecture: any
Depends:
${misc:Depends},
${shlibs:Depends},
Description: <insert up to 60 chars description>
<Insert long description, indented with spaces.>
:~/kali/packages/instaloader$
So we can see a few things that need updating:
Section - we set this to be misc, or if we know for sure it should be another section based off of the sections in Debian testing we can set it to that section
Maintainer - we switch to be the Kali team, rather than an individual
Uploaders - this is the individual(s) who are responsible for packaging up the application
Build-Depends - what packages are required to BUILD the package
Homepage - where is the tool located on the Internet
Vcs-Browser - package source code to view online
Vcs-Git - package source code location
Architecture - what machines can this work on
Depends - what other packages are required for this package to work
Description - short and long description
Most of this we have now figured out from before, so it should make it easier to fill in. We went ahead and created a remote empty git repository on our GitLab account. In our example, this is the end result:
:~/kali/packages/instaloader$ vim debian/control
:~/kali/packages/instaloader$
:~/kali/packages/instaloader$ cat debian/control
Source: instaloader
Section: misc
Priority: optional
Maintainer: Kali Developers <>
Uploaders: Joseph O'Gorman <>
Rules-Requires-Root: no
Build-Depends:
debhelper-compat (= 13),
dh-python,
python3-all,
python3-requests,
python3-setuptools,
Standards-Version: 4.6.1
Homepage: https://instaloader.github.io/
Vcs-Browser: https://gitlab.com/kalilinux/packages/instaloader
Vcs-Git: https://gitlab.com/kalilinux/packages/instaloader.git
Package: instaloader
Architecture: all
Depends:
python3-requests,
${misc:Depends},
${python3:Depends},
Description: Download media along with their metadata from Instagram
Downloads public and private profiles, hashtags, user stories, feeds
and saved media
Downloads comments, geotags and captions of each post.
Automatically detects profile name changes and renames the target
directory accordingly
Allows fine-grained customization of filters and where to store
downloaded media
:~/kali/packages/instaloader$
NOTE: The Build-Depends & Depends are indented with one space (and end with commas). The Description is also indentend with one space.
There is a lot going on here, so lets point out a few things
Something to keep in mind with the formatting of the long descriptions, at about every 70 characters in (to the nearest whole word), we would put a new line, to help keep the formatting under control.
Now onto the dependencies, of which we have: Build & Package. For the build-dependencies of Python 3 we will have to have four things:
debhelper-compat
dh-python
python3-all
python3-setuptools
In a separate guide there will be an explanation as to why these are included, however only the first two are going to be a staple of Python 3 packaging as the latter two are for more specific cases.
In our application, we have another one, python3-requests, which we got from setup.py and that is a requirement from the application. Typically, if there was not a setup.py file, we would not need to include python3-requests in our βBuild-Dependsβ. However, due to the setup.py file, we will need to include python3-requests in both the βBuild-Dependsβ as well as the package βDependsβ. This ensures these packages are always on the system when we install our package (especially handy when using βsbuildβ).
The debhelper-compat level determines how the package will be built. The higher the compat level, the newer the version. Newer versions have certain menial tasks done automatically, so this should not be lowered.
The package dependencies are relatively straightforward. We get rid of the ${shlibs:Depends} as we are packaging up a Python tool, and instead replace it with the python3 depends version ${python3:Depends}. We also ensure that python3-requests is included as the tool requires this. No other dependencies are needed by this tool, so we are done.
The final thing we need to ensure we change is the architecture from any to all, as this tool can be installed on all architectures.
Copyright
Everything that gets created has an original author. They control what happens with it and it needs to be respected. We can call out this in the copyright file.
Below is the skeleton template output (with comments removed):
:~/kali/packages/instaloader$ grep -v '#' debian/copyright
Format: https://www.debian.org/doc/packaging-manuals/copyright-format/1.0/
Source: <url://example.com>
Upstream-Name: instaloader
Upstream-Contact: <preferred name and address to reach the upstream project>
Files:
*
Copyright:
<years> <put author's name and email here>
<years> <likewise for another author>
License: <special license>
<Put the license of the package here indented by 1 space>
<This follows the format of Description: lines in control file>
.
<Including paragraphs>
Files:
debian/*
Copyright:
2020 Joseph O'Gorman <>
License: GPL-2+
This package is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
(at your option) any later version.
.
This package is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
GNU General Public License for more details.
.
You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
along with this program. If not, see <https://www.gnu.org/licenses/>
Comment:
On Debian systems, the complete text of the GNU General
Public License version 2 can be found in "/usr/share/common-licenses/GPL-2".
:~/kali/packages/instaloader$
The original toolβs author has ownership on their work, and the work we have put into creating the package belongs to us. After updating it, it looks like the following:
We removed an optional parameter (Upstream-Contact), as that is touched on in the copyright file.
We put in the homepage of the application to Source
Put the two authors name and addresses from setup.py. The dates came from the LICENSE file
Rather than putting the whole block of MIT license text directly after, we placed it towards the end of the file, and gave a header to it.
We replaced the GPL-2+ used as default for the packaging section with the sameMIT license, which is used in the application. This is the standard for Debian packages (packaging work should match the applicationβs license).
Rules
This file is a Makefile, for building the Debian package.
The output of the template looks like the following:
:~/kali/packages/instaloader$ cat debian/rules
#!/usr/bin/make -f
# See debhelper(7) (uncomment to enable).
# Output every command that modifies files on the build system.
#export DH_VERBOSE = 1
# See FEATURE AREAS in dpkg-buildflags(1).
#export DEB_BUILD_MAINT_OPTIONS = hardening=+all
# See ENVIRONMENT in dpkg-buildflags(1).
# Package maintainers to append CFLAGS.
#export DEB_CFLAGS_MAINT_APPEND = -Wall -pedantic
# Package maintainers to append LDFLAGS.
#export DEB_LDFLAGS_MAINT_APPEND = -Wl,--as-needed
%:
dh
# dh_make generated override targets.
# This is an example for Cmake (see <https://bugs.debian.org/641051>).
#override_dh_auto_configure:
# dh_auto_configure -- \
# -DCMAKE_LIBRARY_PATH=$(DEB_HOST_MULTIARCH)
:~/kali/packages/instaloader$
So there are a lot of items which are pre-commented out, that may be handy for debugging & troubleshooting. Other than the shebang (#!/usr/bin/make -f), there is only two other lines which are currently in use:
%:
dh
Which is a wildcard (%), and feed in all the arguments into dh.
What needs to go here now starts to depend on the program and how complex it is. As our program is a python application we are going to have to tell it to build with python3. We also need to tell it to use pybuild to build, as we have a setup.py file included in the source of the application. If there was not a setup.py file, we would not add this flag. We also need to tell PyBuild the name of the application. This looks like:
NOTE: It uses TAB for indentation, as its a Makefile.
Watch
An additional file which we highly recommend to include is a watch file. This points to upstream, and is then used to detect if there is a more recent version of the application than what is packaged. This is useful when doing updates to packages.
For more information, and example formats, please see the Debian wiki. Using this wiki, we can see there is an example for GitHub which is where our project is stored - github.com/instaloader/instaloader/:
So letβs do a quick check to see if its working right:
:~/kali/packages/instaloader$ uscan -vv --no-download
[...]
uscan info: Found the following matching hrefs on the web page (newest first):
/instaloader/instaloader/archive/v4.4.4rc3.tar.gz (4.4.4rc3) index=4.4.4rc3-1
/instaloader/instaloader/archive/v4.4.4rc2.tar.gz (4.4.4rc2) index=4.4.4rc2-1
/instaloader/instaloader/archive/v4.4.4rc1.tar.gz (4.4.4rc1) index=4.4.4rc1-1
/instaloader/instaloader/archive/v4.4.4.tar.gz (4.4.4) index=4.4.4-1
/instaloader/instaloader/archive/v4.4.3.tar.gz (4.4.3) index=4.4.3-1
[...]
$newversion = 4.4.4rc3
$lastversion = 4.4.4
[...]
uscan: Newest version of instaloader on remote site is 4.4.4rc3, local version is 4.4.4
uscan: => Newer package available from
https://github.com/instaloader/instaloader/archive/v4.4.4rc3.tar.gz
uscan info: Scan finished
:~/kali/packages/instaloader$
Looks like its not! Its correctly detected all the versions, but its not sorted the order correctly (due to the release candidate). We know this by going to the release page:
Not mangling upstream versions that are alphas, betas or release candidates to make them sort before the final release. The solution is to use βuversionmangleβ like this:
However, we need to edit it a bit to fit Instaloader. This can be figured out through trial and error using the above uversionmangle as the base.
Letβs see how it works:
:~/kali/packages/instaloader$ vim debian/watch
:~/kali/packages/instaloader$
:~/kali/packages/instaloader$ cat debian/watch
version=4
opts=uversionmangle=s/(\d)[_\.\-\+]?((RC|rc|pre|dev|beta|alpha|a)\d*)$// \
https://github.com/instaloader/instaloader/tags .*/v?(\d\S+)\.tar\.gz
:~/kali/packages/instaloader$
:~/kali/packages/instaloader$ uscan -vv --no-download
[...]
uscan info: Newest version of instaloader on remote site is 4.4.4, local version is 4.4.4
uscan info: => Package is up to date for from
https://github.com/instaloader/instaloader/archive/v4.4.4.tar.gz
uscan info: Scan finished
:~/kali/packages/instaloader$
Success!
.Install & Helper-Scripts
Everything we have done so far would just be for building the package, but we havenβt said how to install the application:
NOTE: There is no leading slash in the target directory
We can go forward with this, but it may not behave like we were expecting. This is because we donβt have anything in $PATH, so if we went to the command line and tried typing in instaloader.py its not going to work (also it has the file extension, .py). The solution is to create a helper-script, which is placed into $PATH (and we include in the .install file):
With that, all the necessary debian/ files are added. Time to build!
Packing Up
Time to bundle everything into a file. We are going to use sbuild to create the package. This has its pros and cons. One of the pros is that if it builds here, it will also build elsewhere as its meant for build daemons. The down side is, it will require access to a network repository as it will try and handle detecting and installing any dependencies missing in the chroot, making it slower to build.
If you donβt want to use sbuild, just drop it from the arguments (e.g. gbp buildpackage), However, you will be required then to install whatβs in debian/control in the Build-Depends section (e..g sudo apt install -y dh-python python3-all python3-setuptools python3-requests).
So lets give sbuild a try:
:~/kali/packages/instaloader$ gbp buildpackage --git-builder=sbuild
gbp:error: Can't determine package type: Failed to read changelog: can't get HEAD:debian/changelog: fatal: path 'debian/changelog' exists on disk, but not in 'HEAD'
:~/kali/packages/instaloader$
Oops! We havenβt committed our changes to git. Shame on us.
If we wanted to, we could bypass this by doing gbp buildpackage --git-builder=sbuild --git-export=WC, which would allow us to test out our values in debian/ before committing to it, rather than cluttering up the git history with various debugging/troubleshooting commits. Then when we have our package in a working state, we can then commit to git, and try again, like so:
:~/kali/packages/instaloader$ git status
On branch kali/master
Untracked files:
(use "git add <file>..." to include in what will be committed)
debian/
nothing added to commit but untracked files present (use "git add" to track)
:~/kali/packages/instaloader$
:~/kali/packages/instaloader$ git add debian/
:~/kali/packages/instaloader$
:~/kali/packages/instaloader$ git commit -m "Initial release"
[kali/master 10a9e96] Add debian/ files
8 files changed, 94 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 debian/changelog
create mode 100644 debian/control
create mode 100644 debian/copyright
create mode 100755 debian/helper-script/instaloader
create mode 100644 debian/instaloader.install
create mode 100755 debian/rules
create mode 100644 debian/source/format
create mode 100644 debian/watch
:~/kali/packages/instaloader$
Letβs try and build again:
NOTE: You may not get the following error (as it depends on how βcleanβ your OS is):
:~/kali/packages/instaloader$ gbp buildpackage --git-builder=sbuild
gbp:info: Exporting 'HEAD' to '/home/kali/kali/build-area/instaloader-tmp'
gbp:info: Moving '/home/kali/kali/build-area/instaloader-tmp' to '/home/kali/kali/build-area/instaloader-4.4.4'
gbp:info: Performing the build
dh clean --with python3 --buildsystem=pybuild
dh: error: unable to load addon python3: Can't locate Debian/Debhelper/Sequence/python3.pm in @INC (you may need to install the Debian::Debhelper::Sequence::python3 module) (@INC contains: /etc/perl /usr/local/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/perl/5.30.3 /usr/local/share/perl/5.30.3 /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/perl5/5.30 /usr/share/perl5 /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/perl-base /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/perl/5.30 /usr/share/perl/5.30 /usr/local/lib/site_perl) at (eval 25) line 1.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at (eval 25) line 1.
make: *** [debian/rules:7: clean] Error 255
E: Failed to clean source directory /home/kali/kali/build-area/instaloader-4.4.4 (/home/kali/kali/build-area/instaloader_4.4.4-0kali1.dsc)
gbp:error: 'sbuild' failed: it exited with 1
:~/kali/packages/instaloader$
If you see the above error, this is because dh-python is missing from our OS. We can quickly fix this by doing:
The output here is very long, so we have truncated it, but we can see its being built successfully. Even with an error, warning, and information from lintian!
Letβs try to understand the error E: instaloader source: source-is-missing [docs/_static/bootstrap-4.1.3.bundle.min.js]:
:~/kali/packages/instaloader$ lintian-explain-tags source-is-missing
N:
E: source-is-missing
N:
N: The source of the following file is missing. Lintian checked a few possible paths to find the source, and did not find it.
N:
N: Please repack your package to include the source or add it to "debian/missing-sources" directory.
N:
N: Please note, that very-long-line-length-in-source-file tagged files are likely tagged source-is-missing. It is a feature not a bug.
N:
N: Visibility: error
N: Show-Always: no
N: Check: files/source-missing
N:
:~/kali/packages/instaloader$
The issue with the file docs/_static/bootstrap-4.1.3.bundle.min.js is that itβs a minified Javascript. Itβs not human readable, it canβt be modified, therefore itβs not considered as a source file. As Lintian suggests, we can provide the source for this file in debian/missing-sources, however as we do not have the source handy we should explore other options. For this guide we will focus on Lintian overrides. Because the offending file is in the docs directory, which, if we investigate the included files, is what Instaloader uses to host their documentation site pages, we can ignore this file and tell Lintian to as well.
To do this we will create the file instaloader.lintian-overrides located in the debian directory. From here we can copy and paste the error message from the : on. While we are here, we may as well ignore the warning about no-manual-page. Here is our resulting file:
Uh oh! It looks like it still failed, and that it didnβt even use our override for the source-is-missing error! If we look closer, we can see a difference between the previous warning we were getting about no-manual-page and source-is-missing. The section before the :, telling us the level of error and the package name, includes source in our source-is-missing error. This is because the issue resides in the source package, or the imported package, rather than the output, or the binary package. To solve this we will need to create a new source directory in debian/ and a new lintian-overrides file. Lets do that now:
This is looking good (not perfect), and eagle eye spotters may be able to spot why (in the output) - there is the file extension in the output (instaloader.py), yet the command used to call it doesnβt have it (instaloader). We are going to need to either patch the application or find a different way to call the application to address this. But this will be covered in another guide.
Letβs now make sure everything is in git locally, before we push it out to the remote repository (the one we defined in debian/control):
:~/kali/packages/instaloader$ git status
On branch kali/master
nothing to commit, working tree clean
:~/kali/packages/instaloader$
:~/kali/packages/instaloader$ git branch -v
* kali/master 10a9e96 Use lintian-override to clear all warnings and errors
pristine-tar 439fe30 pristine-tar data for instaloader_4.4.4.orig.tar.gz
upstream 494f718 New upstream version 4.4.4
:~/kali/packages/instaloader$
:~/kali/packages/instaloader$ git remote -v
:~/kali/packages/instaloader$
We donβt (yet) have a remote repository setup, so we go to GitLab and create a new project before continuing.
At this point now, a ticket can be opened up on the Kali Linux bug tracker, with a suggestion of the tool & package which you have created, and our tool team will handle it from there.